~ how our guides are made ~

Editorial Standards

Real Food Grower is a data-driven research desk. This page is the full accounting of how every guide gets written, sourced, and reviewed.

Who writes these guides

Every guide on Real Food Grower is authored by the Real Food Grower editorial research desk — an organizational byline, not a person. We do not publish under fabricated names, composite personas, or bylines that don't trace to a real accountable entity. This is a deliberate choice: it aligns with Google's 2024 authenticity policies for E-E-A-T signals, and it aligns with our own view that the methodology on this site is the authority, not any invented personal expertise.

When we cite a specific human source in a guide, it is a real person or institution (e.g., a WSU extension agronomist writing in a specific extension bulletin, a NOAA climatologist behind a specific dataset). We link to their work by URL so the citation is auditable.

The dataset that powers every guide

Real Food Grower operates on a proprietary combined dataset:

Every claim on the site — planting window, watering rhythm, cultivar recommendation, difficulty rating — is either (a) drawn directly from a cited primary source or (b) computed analytically from the dataset above using published methodology.

Primary source ecosystem

Climate coverage

Every Köppen-Geiger climate class present in the US and Canada is represented in our dataset:

BWh
Hot desert
BSh
Hot semi-arid
BWk
Cold desert
BSk
Cold semi-arid
Csa
Hot-summer Mediterranean
Csb
Warm-summer Mediterranean
Cfa
Humid subtropical
Cfb
Oceanic / cool marine
Dfa
Humid continental, hot summer
Dfb
Humid continental, warm summer
Dfc
Subarctic
Aw
Tropical savanna
Am
Tropical monsoon
ET
Alpine tundra

How a guide gets written

  1. Climate lock. Before a word of prose exists, the target plant × city is keyed to the nearest NOAA station, Köppen zone, USDA hardiness zone, and city-level water/deer/frost data. Every recommendation that follows is bound to those numbers.
  2. Difficulty score computed. Our EASY / MODERATE / HARD / VERY HARD score is computed deterministically from the plant's tolerance range vs. the city's climate profile. It is not editorial judgment.
  3. RFG scoring metrics computed. The RFG Score, Container Productivity Score, Water Efficiency Score, Space Efficiency Score, Beginner Success Rating, Grow vs Buy Payback Index (GBPI), and Pesticide Load Index (PLI) are all computed from the same underlying dataset every reader can audit.
  4. Analytical synthesis. The prose sections are drafted as synthesis of cited primary sources, with in-line source links where specific claims (frost dates, cultivar performance, chill hours, pesticide residue counts) are being made.
  5. Cross-reference pass. Every quantitative claim is checked against at least one primary source. Where sources disagree, we cite the disagreement rather than picking silently.
  6. Annual re-review. Every plant × city guide is re-checked against the latest NOAA normals release annually. Corrections are dated and visible.

Corrections policy

If we get something wrong, we want to hear about it. Email [email protected] with the URL and the specific problem. Substantive corrections (a wrong number, a bad cultivar recommendation, a misattributed source) are visible at the top of any page that's been updated, with the date of correction and what changed. We do not silently edit past errors.

What we don't do

Get in touch

Editorial questions, corrections, methodology discussion, licensing, press: [email protected]. Or see the full contact page for other categories.